<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building a low-cost bad-ass &#8220;server&#8221; machine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/27/building-a-low-cost-bad-ass-server-machine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/27/building-a-low-cost-bad-ass-server-machine/</link>
	<description>( to ) ? be : ! be;</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Server Monitoring</title>
		<link>http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/27/building-a-low-cost-bad-ass-server-machine/#comment-5507</link>
		<dc:creator>Server Monitoring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/27/building-a-low-cost-bad-ass-server-machine/#comment-5507</guid>
		<description>Computer memory is so cheap these days that I also would go for 64-bit and 8 Gigabytes of RAM (2x4GB)

Any reason you did not go for the Wolfdale processor line? They have lower power consumption but only 2 core.

Server Monitorings last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/15/wordpress-261-released/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wordpress 2.6.1 released&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Computer memory is so cheap these days that I also would go for 64-bit and 8 Gigabytes of RAM (2&#215;4GB)</p>
<p>Any reason you did not go for the Wolfdale processor line? They have lower power consumption but only 2 core.</p>
<p>Server Monitorings last blog post..<a href="http://www.ghacks.net/2008/08/15/wordpress-261-released/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.ghacks.net');">Wordpress 2.6.1 released</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/27/building-a-low-cost-bad-ass-server-machine/#comment-2018</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 19:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/27/building-a-low-cost-bad-ass-server-machine/#comment-2018</guid>
		<description>Nice Post!  Thanks For The Info..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Post!  Thanks For The Info..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prashanthellina</title>
		<link>http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/27/building-a-low-cost-bad-ass-server-machine/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>prashanthellina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 01:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/27/building-a-low-cost-bad-ass-server-machine/#comment-721</guid>
		<description>You mean add 2GB over 4GB? Even if I did want to add more RAM I would think of jumping to 8GB instead of 6GB to take advantage of dual channelling. I don't think my motherboard supports flexible RAM configs, so I will wait for a while to add more RAM. 4GB seems about right for me now.

I'm using 64-bit Ubuntu 7.10, so I get to use all of 4GB (I'm don't want to shell out cash for Vista!).

A second monitor is very tempting, however I just spent a ton on the touch screen. I will have to wait to fill my wallet :).

I went for E4500 because it was around Rs1000-1500 cheaper than a similar processor that supported Virtualization. Since, my requirement is to run Linux as guest, I can get a modified kernel and run it over Xen to not have or reduce the usual virtualization overhead. As I understand, I will require hardware virtualization only if I have an unmodifiable kernel on my hands (say XP or Vista). &lt;a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/182080/" rel="nofollow"&gt;more info&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean add 2GB over 4GB? Even if I did want to add more RAM I would think of jumping to 8GB instead of 6GB to take advantage of dual channelling. I don&#8217;t think my motherboard supports flexible RAM configs, so I will wait for a while to add more RAM. 4GB seems about right for me now.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m using 64-bit Ubuntu 7.10, so I get to use all of 4GB (I&#8217;m don&#8217;t want to shell out cash for Vista!).</p>
<p>A second monitor is very tempting, however I just spent a ton on the touch screen. I will have to wait to fill my wallet :).</p>
<p>I went for E4500 because it was around Rs1000-1500 cheaper than a similar processor that supported Virtualization. Since, my requirement is to run Linux as guest, I can get a modified kernel and run it over Xen to not have or reduce the usual virtualization overhead. As I understand, I will require hardware virtualization only if I have an unmodifiable kernel on my hands (say XP or Vista). <a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/182080/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/lwn.net');">more info</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sriram Krishnan</title>
		<link>http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/27/building-a-low-cost-bad-ass-server-machine/#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>Sriram Krishnan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/27/building-a-low-cost-bad-ass-server-machine/#comment-709</guid>
		<description>And why did you pick one without support for virtualization? I'm willing to bet you'll want to run Xen or Hyper-V very,very soon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And why did you pick one without support for virtualization? I&#8217;m willing to bet you&#8217;ll want to run Xen or Hyper-V very,very soon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sriram Krishnan</title>
		<link>http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/27/building-a-low-cost-bad-ass-server-machine/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>Sriram Krishnan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/27/building-a-low-cost-bad-ass-server-machine/#comment-708</guid>
		<description>I would suggest adding 2 more GB and using a 64 bit operating system (Vista 64 bit is quite excellent :-) ). Don't go for the extra RAM unless you're planning on using 64-bit though.

Also, if you can afford it, go for a second monitor. I invested in one of these and it is more than worth the money</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would suggest adding 2 more GB and using a 64 bit operating system (Vista 64 bit is quite excellent <img src='http://blog.prashanthellina.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ). Don&#8217;t go for the extra RAM unless you&#8217;re planning on using 64-bit though.</p>
<p>Also, if you can afford it, go for a second monitor. I invested in one of these and it is more than worth the money</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
