<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia Category Graph Generator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/12/wikipedia-category-graph-generator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/12/wikipedia-category-graph-generator/</link>
	<description>In Pursuit of Truth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:27:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Saxe</title>
		<link>http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/12/wikipedia-category-graph-generator/comment-page-1/#comment-40892</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Saxe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 03:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/12/wikipedia-category-graph-generator/#comment-40892</guid>
		<description>Sorry, spoke too soon.  With the default link type my searches were returning an empty graph.  I had to switch the link type to &#039;article category&#039; and then I started getting fairly large structures.  Also the cloud graph layout (alternative algorithm checkbox) tended to work better for me, as the default tree-style layout generated very wide graphs.  Here&#039;s an interesting looking graph:
http://toolserver.org/~dapete/catgraph/graph.php?wiki=wikipedia&amp;lang=en&amp;cat=Oliver+Cromwell&amp;d=0&amp;n=0&amp;format=png&amp;links=0&amp;sub=article&amp;fdp=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, spoke too soon.  With the default link type my searches were returning an empty graph.  I had to switch the link type to &#8216;article category&#8217; and then I started getting fairly large structures.  Also the cloud graph layout (alternative algorithm checkbox) tended to work better for me, as the default tree-style layout generated very wide graphs.  Here&#8217;s an interesting looking graph:<br />
<a href="http://toolserver.org/~dapete/catgraph/graph.php?wiki=wikipedia&#038;lang=en&#038;cat=Oliver+Cromwell&#038;d=0&#038;n=0&#038;format=png&#038;links=0&#038;sub=article&#038;fdp=1" rel="nofollow">http://toolserver.org/~dapete/catgraph/graph.php?wiki=wikipedia&#038;lang=en&#038;cat=Oliver+Cromwell&#038;d=0&#038;n=0&#038;format=png&#038;links=0&#038;sub=article&#038;fdp=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Saxe</title>
		<link>http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/12/wikipedia-category-graph-generator/comment-page-1/#comment-40891</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Saxe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 03:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/12/wikipedia-category-graph-generator/#comment-40891</guid>
		<description>It seems the category graph generator no longer works =(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems the category graph generator no longer works =(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prashanthellina</title>
		<link>http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/12/wikipedia-category-graph-generator/comment-page-1/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>prashanthellina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/12/wikipedia-category-graph-generator/#comment-432</guid>
		<description>David, I agree with you about Wikipedia article classfication being incorrect in some cases. However, I believe the data is still useful for semantic analysis experiments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, I agree with you about Wikipedia article classfication being incorrect in some cases. However, I believe the data is still useful for semantic analysis experiments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gerard</title>
		<link>http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/12/wikipedia-category-graph-generator/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.prashanthellina.com/2007/11/12/wikipedia-category-graph-generator/#comment-413</guid>
		<description>The important thing to remember about the en:wp category scheme is that it doesn&#039;t necessarily make sense, and there&#039;s no reason or authority to make it make sense. This is unfortunate ...

There is talk of a more tag-like scheme for categorisation, where most subcategories would disappear to be replaced by a query on the intersection of two tags. But someone has to write the code, and show it won&#039;t slow the database to a crawl in practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The important thing to remember about the en:wp category scheme is that it doesn&#8217;t necessarily make sense, and there&#8217;s no reason or authority to make it make sense. This is unfortunate &#8230;</p>
<p>There is talk of a more tag-like scheme for categorisation, where most subcategories would disappear to be replaced by a query on the intersection of two tags. But someone has to write the code, and show it won&#8217;t slow the database to a crawl in practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

