I was in the process of trying to understand the classification schemes available in Wikipedia (categories, lists and navigation maps) when I came across this nifty tool. It is very useful to understand the inter-relationships between Wikipedia categories.
You can check it out here: http://tools.wikimedia.de/~dapete/catgraph/
DDDDepressionnnn: Depression Depression Depression aaaaaaaa HEEEEELP :( :( :( I hate winter! I want summer!
Massimo Santi: It works in Windows too. For animated gifs you can set the delay between frames with the delay...
Anil: Hi Guys, We are looking for DYN DNS Service Providers in India. Can any1 help me to get their contact nos. plz....
Flug San Francisco: So if I press the icon on your Hand, will a window pop out of your fingers :) Firefox has nice...187,476 views
Prashanth Ellina is powered by WordPress
No Complaints Shifter Series Theme by Buzzdroid.com
p
David Gerard wrote,
The important thing to remember about the en:wp category scheme is that it doesn’t necessarily make sense, and there’s no reason or authority to make it make sense. This is unfortunate …
There is talk of a more tag-like scheme for categorisation, where most subcategories would disappear to be replaced by a query on the intersection of two tags. But someone has to write the code, and show it won’t slow the database to a crawl in practice.
Link | November 12th, 2007 at 11:58 pm
prashanthellina wrote,
David, I agree with you about Wikipedia article classfication being incorrect in some cases. However, I believe the data is still useful for semantic analysis experiments.
Link | November 13th, 2007 at 7:40 pm